Workers self management at occupied Greek Radio-Television (ERT)

Note: The following is the platform of the workers engaged in the occupation of the ERT television and radio studios in Thessaloniki, Greece.  The workers of this public broadcasting institution occupied the facility in June 2013 after the previous government shut down all of the public radio and television facilities in Greece. They have maintained the occupation ever since and have continued broadcasting 24 hours a day in defiance of the government. The new Syriza government, in one of their first official acts, reopened ERT.  The workers, however, do not want to return to the old system of bosses appointed by politicians telling them what to do. They are pressing  to run the broadcast facility as  a worker managed cooperative.  The statement from the ERT workers is published below. 

Workers self management at occupied Greek Radio-Television (ERT)


The capitalist crisis saw the closure of Greek Radio-Television (ERT) but workers not only resisted they took ERT into collective self management and continued broadcasting. 21 months after its closure the striking workers still ran 17 radio stations (15 regional, two national) and a single TV channel (ET3).
The translation of the texts below has been sent to us by Thanasis, a worker at the ERT and outline how the workers restructured ERT and what they want Syriza to respect if funding is returned.
Thanasis writes " Actually, and in simple words, they fired us but we never left the building and of course we never took an  advance to earn money (publicity etc) respecting the fact that all these buldings and technical stuff belong to the Greek people.  The new government after having recognized our struggle decided to re-open the Public Radio-television. Lets hope they will also incorporate our ideas, those we fought for over the last 2 years. What you will read is not a dream. Is what we already do everyday and we simply propose it for the future. "
«THE ERT WE WANT»
TEXT–PROPOSAL issued by the GENERAL ASSEMBLY of the WORKERS of FREE SELF-MANAGED ERT3

On the occasion of the first anniversary since the government shut down the country’s public broadcaster Hellenic Broadcasting Corporation (ERT) in a coup-like move on the night of June 11, 2013, we the workers of the Self-managed ERT3 who have persevered with our independent struggle to keep ERT3 open for over a year now in order to serve the people by providing regular and independent programming, we the workers who are convinced of our rights and the oncoming vindication, are preparing for the “day after” and are hereby presenting our text/proposal for “The ERT We Want”.
The following text has emanated through direct-democracy procedures, namely through the numerous general assemblies organized by the struggling workers of ERT3 in Thessaloniki. Written word by word by a nine-member working group which was voluntarily selected through our assembly, the proposal was returned to the general assembly for approval before it took its final form.
The proposed text outlines the key principles and aims, the means of financing, the sector of labor relations, the public’s participation and the model of «administration» during ERT’s new period of operation.
It is dedicated to the hundreds of thousands of people who stood by us in solidarity during all these troubled months, as well as to all the Greeks and other peoples who have been profoundly affected by the brutal pro-memorandum government policy of recent years. Yet, it is particularly dedicated to those who refuse to bow their head and choose to carry on with dignity and unceasing efforts until the final victory for freedom and real democracy, instead of yielding in the face of a black regime.
We the workers of Free Self-managed ERT3 are publicizing this document today, calling on all of our struggling colleagues throughout the country, on our brothers and sisters in Athens, in other large cities and in the proud regional stations to embrace our effort so that we may all together press ahead with dignity.
We call upon the general public to support the Public Broadcaster we dream of; this dream is society’s offspring, society gave birth to this dream.
We the workers of Free Self-managed ERT3 declare: VICTORY IS NEAR, NOT BECAUSE VICTORY AWAITS US, BUT BECAUSE WE ARE MOVING TOWARDS VICTORY.

«THE ERT WE WANT»
KEY PRINCIPLES AND AIMS
Independent information and quality-driven cultural/entertainment programming provided by a truly PUBLIC and DEMOCRATIC broadcasting organization constitutes a public good, not a commodity. Freedom of press, uncensored journalistic work, absence of “orders” from superiors, cultural creativity and promotion and the unimpeded conduct of investigative journalism for the good of the general public, especially for the weaker social groups and movements, all constitute a uniform and non-negotiable right and obligation.

The voice of ERT must be transmitted everywhere in Greece and anywhere Greeks reside in the world. The state has a duty to provide the appropriate and necessary infrastructure to fulfill this purpose.
Respect for human rights, both individual and social, is to be enforced by all workers without exception, for the citizens of the country and the world. ERT’s role is partly educational; it is to provide quality cultural material, offer an outlet of expression for the isolated social groups, as well as care for the advancement of the creative imagination of the younger age groups by encouraging interactive skills and critical thinking. ERT ensures in practice the protection of human dignity, while it highlights, denounces and rejects all expressions of racism, bigotry, sexism, nationalism, state authoritarianism or any form of discrimination against individuals or groups targeted for their political / social / trade union action.
ERT serves society and its needs while it also serves as an embankment to the phenomena of "social automation-fragmentation-cannibalism", whenever the given political power attempt to cultivate these traits within the society based on the logic of "divide and rule". ERT checks the political power and does not identify with said power, as it is neither a government body nor an institution at the service of parties and individual or business
The ERT has been serving the community and its needs, while simultaneously an embankment to the phenomena of "social automation-hash-cannibalism", whenever the power of any attempts to cultivate the society based on the premise of "divide and rule". ERT controls the power and not the same as it is neither a government body and its mechanisms, or institution of parties and organized individual or business «circles».
The general assemblies of workers and the active working folk remain vigilant in observing these principles and aims at all stages of ERT’s operation, in order to prevent any attempts at interference, may that be via censorship or other, regardless of which institution this attempt may stem from. FUNDING The licensing fee is ERT’s main source of funding; it is not to be utilized for any purpose unrelated to the public broadcaster’s needs and does not constitute in any way a funding opportunity for the given government (i.e. transferring a portion of the licensing fee to state investments in photovoltaics).
The compensation rate is determined in accordance to income / social criteria. Those living below the poverty line are exempted from paying the licensing fee.
ERT operates under a special economic state, i.e. a public utility that cannot be transferred or sold to private entities. ERT ceases to be a corporation. ERT, as a public broadcaster that actively exercises its role in providing quality information, producing programs that serve as public goods and not commodities, will not become involved in the advertisement genre. The additional financial needs that will arise, may they be for larger-scale productions or for the broadcast of breaking news shall be covered by the state.
Excluded from the no-advertisement clause will be the ERT channel assigned to broadcast an event that is accompanied by sponsorships.

LABOR RELATIONS
All of ERT employees will be hired under an open-ended work agreement, with full-time and exclusive employment and insurance rights, without exception. There will be no differentiation between regular and temporary staff.

All (de)regulatory rules (articles and clauses on contracts or staff regulations) that perpetuate the status of short-term contracted employees and instead conceal fixed and permanent needs in the operation of ERT will become null and void. "Outsourced program collaborators”, "special advisers" and "Special Staff Positions" have no place in the new operation of ERT. There will be no employees transferred from subcontracting companies.
Members of staff with specialized subject work (cleaning crews, security, cameramen, etc.) constitute an integral part of ERT’s human resources and they are individuals hired specifically for the said task, holding the same rights as all other workers. Any significant new need that may arise to cover "gaps" in programming shall be met either through the existing specialized staff and, if this is not feasible, then it shall be covered by staff that will be hired at ERT with exactly the same employment terms that apply to the other workers.
The actual emergencies for external 'seasonal' collaborator or employees with reduced working hours will be reviewed as special cases by the instituted bodies of program production, which will undertake to submit detailed proposals to the body of the General Assembly, which will make the final decisions after assessing all the facts of each case separately.

PARTICIPATION OF SOCIETY
ERT, as a broadscaster with a truly public service character, is behooved to pay close attention to the voice of the very society it addresses. To fulfill this objective, ERT will provide the conditions that enable a participatory formation of the overall philosophy of the transmitted program.

In order to avoid overriding the will of the people and the arbitrary representation of social groups of "factors" and vested interests of the political, social, economic, self-governing powers, the citizens’ society shall have first say in the subsidiary influencing of the overall program philosophy, through its the solidarity structures, social movements, collectives, or individuals who are experiencing racism and repression, neighborhood committees, direct democracy grassroots initiatives and the assemblies of the unions representing the struggling sectors of Greek society. Representatives of these aforementioned living cells of society will undertake to convey the decisions of their general assemblies or the views that are shaped as a general sense of society and, in conjunction with the proposals that will be submitted to ERT (the program committees and ERT staff assemblies) by representatives of various scientific meetings / training / professional sectors, a largely unmediated hearing will have been achieved. This ensures ERT’s truly public nature, which is not merely addressing the public, but is mainly initiated by the people themselves.

ADMINISTRATION
Two of the main characteristics of the months-long struggle maintained by the workers ERT against the government-enforced "black screen", the self-management of the produced programming and the self-administration of the struggle, are incorporated as non-negotiable conquests in the new operation of ERT. The overall philosophy of "administration" is based on direct democratic procedures, the rotation of the various departments supervisors and their direct recall, where the main decision-making body, that is the general assembly of workers, so decides.

The classic notion of directorship or the position of department "supervisor" acquires characteristics that have to do with the ability to exercise a coordinating role in order to improve internal operations and achieve a better result in the transmitted program. The so-called 'managerial prerogative' is abolished and is replaced by the principle of respect among equals. The department coordinators (supervisors) shall be elected by the employees of the department. They are accountable, reviewed and may be recalled by the General Assembly of the workers. The same stands for the individual administrations.
Similarly, the general coordinator (the classic position of general manager) is excluded from the above outline. The election of the general coordinator is made by the general assembly of the employees of ERT. In all, the position of the general coordinator / manager does not hold the power and imposition of a blanket authoritarian management / operation of ERT, but, instead aims to coordinate the departments in order to achieve the best quality results for the benefit of society and the potential for enlargement of the rights and the defense of the gains of the people, including the right to free and independent information and quality entertainment.

ADMINISTRATIVE AUTONOMY
ERT, regardless where it broadcasts from, constitutes a unified, public broadcasting organization, while, concurrently, each and every channel, radio or digital media of ERT (among them ERT3) maintains its administrative autonomy. ERT has the necessary human resources and the appropriate broadcasting infrastructure in every county of Greece, in order to assure that any local or breaking news in the given regions is covered on the spot.

Solidarity, mutual understanding, respect for autonomy and coordination among the members of this public broadcaster constitute prerequisites not only for the implementation and consolidation of internal direct democracy procedures, but also for the prevention of a centrally-controlled administration. Nationwide meetings of coordinators and committees of all broadcasting units in the country will be held at regular intervals, conveying the decisions of the general meetings of workers and civil society in order to exchange views, to address weaknesses and to continuously improve the broadcast program.

Share:

The Greek people have shaken the world


*********************************************************************************
Note: We are reprinting an article by Savas Michael-Matsas summarizing the current state of the class struggle in Greece. Michael-Matsas is the Secretary of the EEK, the Workers Revolutionary Party of Greece. The views are those of the author and not necessarily those of the permanent-revolution web site. We do think this statement gives one a good idea of the current situation in Greece and of the possibilities that have emerged for the intervention of revolutionary socialists. We have previously published the election statement of the EEK along with our comments.
We made stylistic corrections to the original English translation and added footnotes.
*********************************************************************************


The Greek people have shaken the world

 by Savas Michael-Matsas

The Greek election of January 2015 was  not a “normal” parliamentary contest. It marks a major turning point in the post 2007 world capitalist crisis, and the international class struggle. The European Union and the Eurozone re-emerges as the epicenter of the crisis. The illusions of an apparent “stabilization” in the financial markets after Draghis' famous statement in 2012 that the ECB  will do “whatever it takes” to avoid the collapse of the Eurozone,  are now dissipating.  The Eurozone economy, both in the periphery and now in its “hard core”, is  entangled  in a vicious circle of  recession, deflation and over-indebtedness, while all the draconian austerity measures and policies so far implemented, have totally failed to halt the downward spiral.

       The launching of a much delayed “Quantitative Easing” program  by the ECB on January 22, on the eve of the Greek elections, is a manifestation of this failure. The political expression of that failure is the electoral victory of Syriza in Greece, a few days later, which, as  Philip Stephens rightly writes in the Financial Times( 29/1/2015) “crystallizes the impasse that has crippled the eurozone”. [1]

      On the very day of the  Greek elections, the World  Economic Forum of the  world's capitalist elites in Davos concluded its meeting with statement stressing that “politics in Europe is the greatest risk for the world economy”,  naming especially  Greece and Ukraine. The  massive repudiation of “austerity” by the Greek people  came  as a huge shock, confirming all their fears.

       After  five consecutive  years of social catastrophe that has reduced the Greek people into a nation of the destitute, millions of innocent victims, using their vote as an available weapon, rebelled  against their  executioners: the troika of  European Union,  European Central Bank, and the IMF as well as their  subservient  bourgeois governments in Athens that had imposed  the measures of  social cannibalism misnamed “austerity” and “structural reforms”, and codified as  the 'Memorandum' tied to the  'rescue packages' by the EU and the IMF to bankrupt Greece.

       All the parties that had governed  under the orders of  troika,  first of all the  right wing New Democracy and the neo-liberal “center left” PASOK, were defeated.  Some of them were marginalized, others completely annihilated : PASOK, the far right LAOS,  the “Democratic Left”, as well as the “new”  split  from PASOK headed by former Prime Minister George Papandreou, the first to introduce the Memorandum in 2010.

        For the first time in the history of modern Greece, a party of the Left was handed  an electoral triumph: the  anti-austerity reformist Syriza. Promising to put an end to  misery, to the Memorandum  and to the troika's tyranny, it was raised  by a  massive  popular  vote into the leading position, enabling it to form a government.

         Less than three years ago, up to the elections of May and June 2012, Syriza was  a small, moderate, left-reformist party, emerging from splits in the Greek Communist Party in the 1960s and 1990s, joined later by small groups of the extra-parliamentary left, with a modest base in the working class, the unions and the petty bourgeoisie  and a marginal role in the youth and student movements, getting around 4 per cent of the vote. But in the 2012 elections, it  was catapulted into the second position of the official opposition with 27 per cent. Why?

        The social devastation  and upheavals of the period of 2010-12, the mass demonstrations, occupations of public buildings and squares, above all, the occupation of Syntagma Square in front of the discredited Parliament by the “Indignant” people, the General Strikes, People's  Assemblies, as well as the  barbaric  brutality of the police in reaction to these events - led to the crisis of legitimacy and disintegration of the bourgeois  parliamentary system. That system, as it was established after the fall of the military dictatorship in 1974, consisted of New Democracy and PASOK alternately taking on the helm of government.

     No party, including Syriza, had played a leading role in the upheaval of 2010-12. One week  before the May 6, 2012 elections,  Syriza's support still remained around  8 -10 per cent. The main focus of the spontaneous movement then  being  in favor of  a protest vote for many “small” parties considered to be  “non systemic”.  The decisive turn came when at the last stage of the campaign the Syriza leadership launched the call “For a Government of the Left to cancel the Memorandum!” Then, much of the popular  anger and hopes turned en masse to the left as a credible alternative to power and gave to Syriza an unexpected and astounding advance. Unexpected, although in a minor scale,  was, also, the threatening ascent of the Nazi “ Golden Dawn”,  from a  marginal group into a force  entering  Parliament for the first time.

           The call for   “For a Government of the Left” , in the Greek historical context has a totally different significance  in comparison  with other European countries where often parliamentary “governments of the left” were formed by social democratic parties in coalition or not with 'Communist' parties. Greece never knew  a  mass social democracy (PASOK was a national populist  movement of bourgeois character, later degenerating into neoliberalism). The country is profoundly marked by imperialist intervention and a bloody civil war in the 1940s to “smash the communist threat” coming out of the anti-Nazi Resistance. Decades of  anti-communist hysteria followed with  persecutions, concentration camps, executions, and witch-hunts of anything considered as “leftist”. The climax came with the dictatorship of the CIA colonels in 1967. That regime collapsed in 1974, following the brutal suppression of  the  youth rebellion of the Polytechnic  in Athens, and   the coup by the Greek junta in Cyprus opening the door to the Turkish invasion and occupation of half of the island.  Given this historical conjuncture,   a “government of the Left” means, in the popular social consciousness, a government by the political representatives of the  defeated revolutionary movement of the Partisans.

        Not by accident, during the revolt of December 2008, the slogan "Varkiza is finished" was written on the walls of Athens. [In Varkiza, near Athens, the  partisans  of ELAS, after the Stalinist betrayal,   surrendered their arms to the British military and to the shadow of Greek bourgeois power] Nor by accident as well, during the recent electoral period, despite Syriza's moderation, the Right wing Samaras  government  waged a  vicious anti-communist campaign using the same slogans as in the civil war, against the “Sovietization of Greece”, “for the salvation of  fatherland, religion and family”, even “for the  defense of our  victory in 1949 against the communist bandits”, while the Nazis of the  “Golden Dawn”  presented themselves as “the only force able to defeat  Syriza's communists and Marxist anti-nationalism”. The virulence of the slogans  reflects the sharp polarization that is now an enduring feature of social life in Greece.    

       No one should forget that the Golden Dawn, with its leaders in prison  still emerged  as the third force in Parliament with a civil war, fascist agenda. The January 2015 elections  were not the end of the crisis of State power but an opening of a new,  sharper period escalating inexorably, driven by the capitalist crisis,  towards a historic confrontation of the  workers and poor  with  the Greek and  international  ruling classes and their repression forces. 

           Despite the  tremendous victory given to Syriza by the people moving to the left,  the Syriza leadership itself  moved to the right :  they formed a coalition “Popular Front” type government of class collaboration with the “Independent Greeks”- ANEL, a far right bourgeois nationalist party, anti-immigrant, anti-Semitic, Islamophobic, Turcophobic, homophobic, religiously obscurantist. Furthermore,  together with other ministries, Syriza offered the Ministry of the Armed Forces  to the leader of ANEL Panos Kammenos, a notorious chauvinist, anti-Semite,  a  close friend of the Greek shipowners and his co-thinker Nigel Farage, leader of the anti-immigrant far right UKIP. Memories of Chile in 1973 are raised, and the appointment of Pinochet to a similar  position by Allende are inescapable.

        Phony arguments were presented:  because Syriza was two seats short of forming a majority in parliament, this alliance with ANEL was  supposedly necessary to form a government given the  stubborn rejection of any support by the Stalinist KKE; or, that it was a “lesser evil”  to have as ally ANEL than the bogus Potami (“River”:  a “party” artificially constructed by  bourgeois mass media magnates, uniting remnants of the center left with the most right wing neo-liberals). 

          Syriza  could  have again put  pressure  on the KKE  to join it in a coalition government, much more relevant now  than in 2012.  And in any case, it could have put  the Stalinist leaders in a very difficult  position in front of their supporters.  To choose between ANEL and Potami is to choose between cholera and pestilence. But even without the KKE, formally, Syriza could form a minority government based on 149 seats, which could stand,  if other parties  abstained or were absent, giving objectively a “vote of tolerance”. Otherwise, by voting against, these parties  could be shown as responsible for new elections that nobody wanted.

        It is obvious that the coalition between Syriza and ANEL was a decision already taken before the elections (Kammenos did not make any effort to hide it). And it was announced, hurriedly,  during the same night of the elections, without  formally trying to search for other options, and  behind the back of the Party itself and its supporters.   

       The main argument  to excuse this haste is that “Syriza had to immediately form a coalition with [bourgeois] patriotic  anti-austerity forces to have a solid basis in its  extremely difficult negotiations with the EU as the bailout program expires in February 28.” The strategy of “a national anti-austerity unity” above classes is counter-posed to a  strategy of internationalist class struggle  towards  workers power and  a socialist way out from the crisis of bankrupt capitalism in Greece and Europe.

        The justification advanced by Syriza of their class collaboration with  reactionary nationalists is not only unsustainable but also self-defeating. In the inescapable confrontation with the imperialists of the EU and the international usurers, any basis  for a real defense of the  workers' and the interests of the masses is undermined by their refusal to break from the imperialist EU  and  by  allying with bourgeois forces looking for an impossible “national capitalist solution” within an unprecedented world capitalist depression. This is a strategy not  to defeat the stranglehold of the imperialist predators  but to defeat the emerging forces of socialist revolution in Greece and in Europe. Brussels, Berlin, and Washington know it very well.
         
                                                     
         Syriza's  demands are for an  impossible compromise. To survive as a government it has to  respond to the popular expectations by fighting austerity; but that means  to clash with the austerity imposed by the EU and Germany. To fight austerity  means to find  relief from the burden of an unsustainable Greek debt, and at the same time, to avoid the consequences of a Grexit. Syriza looks for a bargain with a hostile but  frightened  EU, hoping to find  a space in the starting international re-negotiation  imposed by the failure to confront the crisis so far by  means of austerity. 

            The new Greek government  started by declarations  that  the fired  public sector workers will be rehired, that privatizations of  harbors and  electricity will be canceled, while the flamboyant Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis  was openly defying the leader of the Eurogoup, rejecting  both  the extension of the Memorandum and any return of the hated troika. The Greek people were delighted but neither Brussels nor Berlin were smiling.  From the other side of the ocean, significantly, Obama  phoned the new Prime Minister Tsipras to congratulate him and to express his opposition to...austerity!

          While Varoufakis is  making his tour around the European capitals  insisting that he seeks no confrontation but “deliberation”, the confrontation has already begun.  Berlin openly expressed its  hostility to any change. The ECB has the means, by stopping the  financing of the Greek banks, to provoke their collapse after March of this year. George Osborne, the UK Chancellor, emphasized after his discussion with Varoufakis: “the stand-off between Greece and the eurozone is the greatest risk to the global economy ” ( Financial Times  2/2/2015).[2] The Wall Street  Journal echoed the same concern.

       The fears of the ruling classes in the imperialist West were compounded  by the initial questioning by the new Greek government of the  announcement by the EU that  it had agreed “unanimously" to impose new sanctions against Russia,  blaming it for the new  escalation of the civil war in South-Eastern Ukraine. But afterward, the Tsipras government made clear that it was questioning the process, the fact that it was not consulted, and not the essence of the matter. Then, the new Foreign Minister, Nikos Kotzias (an opportunist who started as a high priest of Stalinism in the KKE  to jump later to PASOK becoming a close adviser to George Papandreou before  taking   the  ministry of  foreign affairs in the current government) has signed the  document of the EU extending the sanctions  against Russia  until September 2015.  By signing he made  the following servile comment: “ I am not a Russian puppet[...]We are not against every sanction. We are in the mainstream, we are not the bad boys” ( Mail On Line, 31/1/2015)

      From a certain vantage point, the new government Syriza-ANEL could be  seen as a  transitional formation combining all the contradictions of Greek society in the current  phase of the world crisis. Rather sooner than later  these contradictions will explode.  It has some features of a Kerensky type of government in a transitional period towards the  decisive class confrontation in the struggle for power.

        The EEK  fights  among the masses in all fronts  to prepare, organize, educate the proletarian vanguard  for this confrontation between revolution and counter-revolution.  This is the reason  behind our independent intervention in the elections with our own lists and program:  to  build a revolutionary alternative in  the working class without tail ending Syriza, and without turning our back on the masses following Syriza.

        As a small revolutionary party  with the  vast majority of members  unemployed and the rest  with wages or pensions  drastically cut in the last years, we could not afford  the enormous  financial cost, a few months  from our latest national participation  in the May 2014  European elections,  to  present independent candidates all over Greece. So we  were limited  to participate only in 25 among the 56 regions of the country.  We got  only 2,441 votes votes, 0.04 per cent. The dominant tendency was to vote Syriza  to get rid of the Right, the Memorandum of austerity, and the rule of the troika.

        In a very polarized  situation and  with only  2-3 weeks for  campaigning, all our comrades made  a heroic effort that everyone in Greece respected.. We had  found  a warm response among new layers of the oppressed. Our appearances on television and radio  on a national and local level made a deep impression and provoked energetic debates.   Our intervention  was also discussed on the international stage.  Not only did we get the support  of our  comrades of the CRFI   in Argentina, Italy, and Turkey ( the comrades  of the Turkish DIP actively helped our campaign, and we are grateful to this demonstration of internationalism in practice) but also beyond: from Russia and Ukraine to Portugal, and from the US  to Scotland, England, Austria, South Africa and Australia. The international importance of this battle attracted the attention of fighters everywhere.

       Internationalism  was one of the main demarcation lines  of the EEK from  reformism and centrism, in a situation where all forms of   virulent  nationalisms are clashing all over Europe again as in the 1930s.

       Two battles on that front were particularly important:  the  clash before the elections with the centrist ANTARSYA when its majority made an alliance with “left” nationalists advocating the return to the drachma and opposing the socialist unification of Europe; secondly, after the elections, immediately after the formation of the coalition government Syriza-ANEL when we  raised the transitional demand: “Out with the far right  nationalist bourgeois ministers - for a Syriza/KKE government of the Left, based on the organizations of the working class, and with a socialist program to exit from the crisis”. Our call found a great response among the members and supporters of  Syriza, even  in the ranks of the KKE which remains dominated  by bureaucratic  sectarianism and blindness to the change in the situation. The main  pro-Syriza evening daily Efimerida ton Syntakton  published (28/1/15) in  a prominent place in its center pages our Call against the class collaboration of Syriza with  the   far right nationalist party  ANEL.

       Fighting both  sectarian  blindness and opportunist adaptation to the new government, we  intervene in the class struggle actualizing our program with transitional demands - to cancel the debt, to end austerity and unemployment, to break from the imperialists of the EU, the US and NATO, for bread, jobs, freedom, health, education, to take back  the life that they had stolen from us, the people. Thus, we develop our ties  with the broad masses now entering, with renewed hope and courage, into the arena of struggle where their fate  will be decided. 

                                                                                        February 3, 2015










Share:

Experience in scare quotes: sectarianism and the Greek election

by Frank Brenner


First cabinet meeting of new government of Greece, presided over by Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras
On the premise that sometimes knowing the wrong way to do something helps in figuring out the right way, here is a quote from the World Socialist Web Site (WSWS)  about the victory of Syriza in last week's national election in Greece.

The International Committee of the Fourth International rejects with contempt the political excuse offered by the petty-bourgeois pseudo-left to justify support for Syriza and its pro-capitalist agenda—that a Tsipras government is a necessary “experience” for the working class, from which it will somehow come to understand the necessity for genuinely socialist policies.
Such sophistries are advanced only to oppose the emergence of a revolutionary movement of the working class, a development possible only through a relentless political exposure of Syriza. This task is undertaken by the World Socialist Web Site in order to prepare workers and young people for the decisive struggles they face in Greece and internationally.


This is from an article on Jan. 27. And here's another one posted the next day, making the same point. (In both cases, the underlining is by me).

Another of their arguments is that one must support Syriza, so that the working class can go through these experiences and learn from them. This is pure cynicism. Given the enormous dangers posed by a Syriza government, the task of a Marxist party is to expose the class interests represented by Syriza, to warn the working class against its consequences and provide it with a clear socialist orientation.

This is how the World Socialist Web Site and the International Committee of the Fourth International participate in the “experiences” in Greece. The numerous pseudo-left groups cling to Syriza because they represent the same class interests as this party. They speak for better-off layers of the middle class, who fear an independent movement of the working class, and who are concerned to ensure their own social elevation within the bourgeois order.

These quotes are both examples of what Marxists call sectarianism. You can read Trotsky's classic diagnosis of this degenerative political disease here.

What I find striking is how in both these quotes the word experience (or experiences) is in scare quotes. The ostensible target of this criticism is other “pseudo-left” groups, but the real target is the masses: it is their experience that is being denigrated (“rejects with contempt”) with these scare quotes. They voted in their millions for a party whose Greek acronym stands for Coalition of the Radical Left. Nothing like this has happened in Europe in more than half a century. The election has also aroused the hopes of millions of other victims of savage austerity in Spain, Portugal and Italy. It marks the upsurge of a mass movement seeking radical social change. If you don't find this important, then you aren't a revolutionary.

Sectarians see things differently. What they see is – to use a prefix much favored by WSWS writers – a 'pseudo' experience. Nothing significant happened in the Greek election. “Syriza’s election victory does not express a political development, a step forward, progress or anything of the kind by or for the working class.” For them political analysis is quite simple: what happened is not a revolution, hence it is reactionary. One bourgeois party replaced another bourgeois party in power: that is their reading of the election.

To be sure, Greece is still a long way from a revolutionary overthrow of capitalism, but you hardly need the accumulated wisdom of Marxism to see that. What you do need that wisdom for is to properly assess whether or not this experience is a step towards that ultimate goal, and use that assessment as the basis for intervening in the political life of the masses.

Sectarians aren't interested in steps, or should I say “steps”. For them the Syriza victory doesn't count as a step forward. But what would count? Apart from more people reading the WSWS or joining the SEP, these sectarians have no answer for that, and see no pressing need to come up with one.

Marxists use a category like “bourgeois party” to understand political reality more deeply, but in the hands of a sectarian such a category becomes devoid of content, and little more than a form of name-calling. Thus we are told by the WSWS that in “its origin, social composition and politics, Syriza is a bourgeois party” comparable to Barack Obama and the Democrats. In fact, the core of Syriza comes from the Eurocommunists who split from the pro-Soviet wing of the Communist Party in the late 1980s. Stalinist parties are not revolutionary parties, but Trotskyists have never simply labeled them bourgeois because this distorts their origin and the specific nature of their relationship to the working class.

Syriza eventually evolved into an umbrella organization for 13 groups, including social democrats, Maoists, Trotskyists, left ecologists and liberals. Again this is not a revolutionary party but neither is it a conventional bourgeois party: to that extent at least, the featuring of Radical Left in its name is not false advertising. And that matters because millions of voters came to identify their aspirations with Syriza precisely because they saw it as a radical departure from the mainstream. Nor are those aspirations just for vague promises of hope and change a la Obama: they are very clearly for an end to austerity.

Such distinctions are important for revolutionary Marxists but not for sectarians. “Sectarians are capable of differentiating between but two colors: red and black. So as not to tempt themselves, they simplify reality. They refuse to draw a distinction between the fighting camps in Spain for the reason that both camps have a bourgeois character” (Trotsky).

Another way of saying this is that sectarians have a kitchen-sink approach to politics. A good example is the constantly used epithet “pseudo-left” on the WSWS. If you unpack this phrase, what it means is that everyone else on the left isn't left at all, they're all just “pseudo-left”. This includes any and all parties calling themselves Marxist or Trotskyist or revolutionary socialist. The only truly left party on the planet is the SEP. Everyone else belongs in the sink of “pseudo-leftism”. Here the rhetoric gets so far removed from reality as to become delusional.

Sectarians have only contempt for “experience” but they have enormous faith in propaganda. In their view, it is “sophistries” to say that the Greek working class needs to go through the experience of a Syriza government “from which it will somehow come to understand the necessity for genuinely socialist policies.” What the workers really need is “a relentless political exposure of Syriza”, which is to say, propaganda by the WSWS. The second quote hammers home the same point: it is “pure cynicism” to imagine that “the working class can go through these experiences and learn from them”. Instead, “the task of a Marxist party is to expose the class interests represented by Syriza, to warn the working class against its consequences and provide it with a clear socialist orientation” ... in other words, propaganda.

Which raises an important question – how does the working class learn? Does it learn primarily from propaganda, no matter how “relentless”, or does it learn primarily from its own experiences, with or without scare quotes? The SEP, which is vehemently materialist in its stated philosophical views, is actually idealist when it comes to its politics: propaganda matters, experience not at all.

But this isn't how the real world works. Nor is it how Marxists have traditionally understood their task as revolutionaries. Marxists aren't contemptuous of the experience of the masses; on the contrary, they do everything possible to engage with that experience. What does engage mean in this context? Trotsky addressed this in The Transitional Program: it means finding a bridge between the present situation – in Greece, the fight against austerity – and the fight for socialism.

Of course this involves propaganda for socialism, to the widest extent possible. And it means not pulling any punches in criticisms of the new government, particularly any concessions it makes to the domestic bourgeoisie or the European financial elites. A major political upsurge of the masses creates great dangers as well as great opportunities. We already have an example of this in Greece, with Syriza forming a government with a right-wing populist party. But sectarians see only the dangers and “reject with contempt” the opportunities. They do “not understand the dialectical action and reaction between a finished program and a living – that is to say, imperfect and unfinished – mass struggle.”

In the case of Greece, engaging with the masses means putting demands on Syriza which can mobilize broad support. Employment in particular seems to be what in American political parlance is called a “wedge issue” – an excellent phrase that revolutionaries should adopt. In Greece we need a program of demands addressed to “wedge issues” – demands designed to drive a wedge between the deep desire of the masses to end austerity and the obscene wealth of the elites who cannot accommodate that desire. Such a program would work to activate mass struggles and create the conditions for workers and young people to learn from their own experiences that only socialism will bring an end to austerity. This really would be a  revolutionary policy, in stark contrast to the pseudo-revolutionary rhetoric of sectarianism.

Engaging with the masses also means listening to them, not just hectoring at them. Take for example Syriza's alliance with the right-wing populist Independent Greeks. For a sectarian this is just an 'I told you so' moment. But this isn't how revolutionaries operate. Here is a Syriza supporter, in fact writing a comment reacting to one of the WSWS sectarian diatribes:
“The cooperation between SYRIZA and the 'Independent Greeks' was a necessary evil in order to make an anti austerity coalition in order to form a government. The Communist Party of Greece will not even speak to SYRIZA and the 'River' party, although claiming to be what you would call 'pseudo left' is more for maintaining the economic status-quo than the other parties and the PASOK is completely sold out so not much room for choice. The expressed line of the IGs are anti-austerity and their actions have shown this to be so.”
Marxists would disagree that the alliance with the Independent Greeks was a “necessary evil', but it's not enough just to dismiss such an argument or denounce it. The points about the other parties are entirely true, and the voters who backed Syriza wanted them to form a government. Under these circumstances, it would seem that a minority government would have been possible, and that the Syriza leadership opted for a formal alliance, including handing the crucial Defense Ministry to the Independent Greeks, to give themselves some political 'wiggle room'. This raises a crucial question: can you fight austerity and yet be pro-capitalist, as the Independent Greeks are? This person still seems to think that's possible, and no doubt he is far from being alone in this regard. If Greek revolutionaries are ever to get a hearing from such people, they will have to inoculate themselves against sectarianism.


The Transitional Program is still offered for sale at the  online bookstore affiliated with the WSWS






Share:

100th Anniversary of the October Revolution

100th Anniversary of the October Revolution
Listen to special broadcast

ΟΧΙ: Greece at the Crossroads

ΟΧΙ: Greece at the Crossroads
Essays on a turning point in Greece 2014 - 2017

Order ΟΧΙ : Greece at the Crossroads

Permanent Revolution Press

Permanent Revolution Press
Print edition of Crackpot Philosophy

Order Crackpot Philosophy

Trump and the train wreck of American liberalism

Trump and the train wreck of American liberalism
Two essays by Frank Brenner

Order PDF of 'Trump and the train wreck of American liberalism'

PDF of Brenner on Trump -$1

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *